Normally I would not write about what leadership is not. But a few days ago, Michael Jordan, arguably the greatest basketball player ever, was inducted into the hall of fame along with Jerry Sloan, C. Vivian Stringer, John Stockton and David Robinson, and the differences in their approaches were so striking that it is, for me, a leadership lesson not to be missed.
While there can be no questioning Jordan’s greatness in terms of basketball prowess, having observed the speeches given by each of his peers, followed by his own, I am willing to contend that he is the least of the leaders in that group.
Here are two reasons why:
- Leadership is partly about outcomes, yes, but it is also about priorities, not just those evidenced in stats and on scoreboards. Jordan seems to have failed to recognize this. His remarks carried the tone of one ill at ease without such measures, struggling to define himself in ways other than by competing. In contrast, his peers spoke at length about other areas of their lives, and exhibited the richness of community and giving back. Jordan’s comments, in contrast, spoke of being recognized, and winning was the focal point of every anecdote he related. He stood awkwardly as a man reliving old glories, as opposed to one who had found and pursued new ones.
- Leadership is about others. So impressive were Stockton and Robinson as each of them spoke directly and specifically to each of their children, telling them one by one what gifts they possess and expressing joy and pride in those. Jordan’s primary remark to his children was, “I wouldn’t want to be you guys,” presumably because none of them would live up to his own feats. Aside from a brief reference to Scottie Pippen, he mentioned others only in the context of “putting wood on the competitive fire,” giving him reason to prove doubters wrong or defy his critics.
Leadership, among other things, is about priorities, and it is about others. And prioritizing others, unfortunately, is something Michael Jordan, the greatest basketball player ever, was (and, unfortunately, is) seemingly unable to do.
And that is why, though he has accomplished much else, he is not an accomplished leader.

Recent Comments